From Trade War to Global Tension: Trump’s Economic Policies and Sustainable Peace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58290/ijpap.v1i2.201Keywords:
Trade war, Trump administration, global tension, economic policy, peace sustainabilityAbstract
The Trump administration introduced a notable transformation in the United States' foreign and economic policy, primarily through assertive trade measures that heightened global economic tensions. This study explored the extent to which the administration’s trade confrontations, particularly with China, contributed to growing geopolitical instability and posed challenges to maintaining international peace. It focused on the effects of protectionist economic strategies on global diplomatic relations and examined their broader implications for long-term stability. Utilizing a historical research approach, it draws on a range of primary and secondary materials, such as political speeches, trade documents, policy records, and academic literature. This study adopted the Realist Theory of International Relations as its guiding framework, emphasizing how Trump’s economic policies were driven by national self-interest and the pursuit of power within the global system. The study found that policies such as the imposition of unilateral tariffs, the retreat from multilateral trade agreements, and the use of combative rhetoric weakened alliances, disrupted international trade networks, and heightened diplomatic tensions, particularly with China. These developments undermined global cooperative systems and eroded mechanisms intended to address economic disputes peacefully. The study concluded that although the policies were designed to protect American economic interests, they unintentionally fueled international discord and threatened global peace efforts. It recommends, among others, that the United States should renew its commitment to multilateral trade systems, including active participation in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and reengagement with regional trade agreements such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). Such engagement would reinforce the rules-based global trading system, restore trust with international partners, and foster collaborative economic development rooted in shared norms.
Downloads
References
Amiti, M., Redding, S. J., & Weinstein, D. E. (2019). The Impact of the 2018 Trade War on U.S. Prices and Welfare. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(4), 1793–1849. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz036
Blanchard, E. J., Bown, C. P., & Crowley, M. A. (2022). Trump’s Trade War: A Costly and Ineffective Disruption. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 26610. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26610
Bown, C. P. (2020). The 2018–2019 US–China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(4), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.4.143
Bown, C. P., & Irwin, D. A. (2023). Protectionism and Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from U.S. Trade Wars. Journal of International Economics, 138, 37 - 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2023.103788
Bown, C. P., & Kolb, M. (2021). Trump’s Trade Policy: Protectionism at the Expense of U.S. Global Leadership. Journal of International Economics, 133, 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103503
Campos, N. F., Timini, J., & Freund, C. (2024). Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Cost of Decoupling. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 31980. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31980
Chen, Y., & Zeng, L. (2024). Trade wars and global governance: The impact of U.S.–China rivalry on multilateral institutions. World Development, 172, 106415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106415
Donnelly, J. (2000). Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612510
Ehlermann, C. D. (2021). The Demise of WTO Dispute Settlement: What Next for Multilateralism? Journal of International Economic Law, 24(3), 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab023
Evenett, S. J., & Fritz, J. (2020). Economic Sanctions and the Erosion of WTO Norms. Global Trade Alert, SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3542154
Evenett, S. J. (2021). Global Trade and Economic Recovery: The Fragility of Rules-Based Order. World Development, 142, 105501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105501
Evenett, S., & Baldwin, R. (2023). The return of industrial policy: A new era of geoeconomics. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39(4), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grac026
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020). The Return to Protectionism. American Economic Review, 110(2), 398–434. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181214
Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2022). Weaponized Interdependence and the Strategic Logic of Global Supply Chains. European Journal of International Relations, 28(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661211065768
Gartzke, E., & Rohner, D. (2022). Interdependence and peace revisited: Fragile benefits in a fractured order. World Politics, 74(3), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887122000106
Hoekman, B., & Wolfe, R. (2021). Revitalizing Multilateral Trade Governance at the WTO. World Trade Review, 20(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745621000057
Hopewell, K. (2022). Trade wars and the future of global economic governance. International Affairs, 98(1), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab249
Ikenberry, G. J. (2020). The next liberal order: The age of contagion demands more internationalism, not less. Foreign Affairs, 99(4), 133–142.
IMF. (2024). World Economic Outlook: Managing Fragmentation and Uncertainty. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2024/04/10/world-economic-outlook-april-2024
Inoue, H., Long, J., & Neumayer, E. (2023). WTO membership and militarized interstate disputes: Evidence from global trade networks. British Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123423000057
Kawashima, Y. (2024). Japan’s response to U.S. unilateralism: Tariffs, alliances, and economic diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific. Asian Affairs, 55(2), 129–147.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2024.1992160
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1989). Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kim, H., & Shaw, A. (2021). The geopolitics of economic nationalism: Trump, tariffs, and trade diplomacy. Global Studies Quarterly, 1(2), 17 - 27. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab017
Kim, Y., & Shaw, T. M. (2021). Sidelining Multilateralism: U.S.-China Trade Conflict and Reciprocal Economic Nationalism. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 14(3), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poab006
Lee, J. Y., & Park, C. H. (2025). South Korea’s foreign policy realignment in the era of economic coercion. Journal of Strategic Studies, 48(3), 412–436.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2025.2043200
Lim, D. Y. M., & Ferguson, K. M. (2022). The Collapse of U.S. Trade Leadership: TPP, RCEP, and the Asian Trade Regime. World Trade Review, 21(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000199
Mansfield, E. D., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2020). Trade Institutions and the Mitigation of Interstate Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(2–3), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719900073
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Meijer, H., & Brooks, S. G. (2024). Atlantic drift? The transatlantic alliance and the return of geopolitics. International Affairs, 100(1), 55–73.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad067
Mendez, A., & Zeng, J. (2022). The Great Decoupling? U.S.–China Economic Fragmentation and the Future of Global Order. International Affairs, 98(6), 2015–2034. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac061
Min, Y. (2025). County-Level Effects of U.S. Trade Policy, 2018–2025. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(1), 23 - 35. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa032
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Pelc, K. J. (2021). What’s a Trade War Worth? Strategic Dispute Initiation at the WTO. Annual Review of Political Science, 24, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013651
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, D. C. (2025). Authoritarian opportunism in a divided West: Implications for the liberal international order. International Organization, 79(2), 289–312.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818325000057
Wu, Y., & Li, M. (2023). Techno-nationalism and the Weaponization of Innovation: The Global Implications of the U.S.–China Technology War. World Development, 168, 106153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106153
Xu, H. (2024). Tariffs and the Fragmentation of Global Supply Chains: Sectoral Evidence from the U.S.-China Trade War. Journal of International Economics, 137, 10 - 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.103817
Zeng, K. (2023). Strategic Decoupling and Economic Nationalism in the U.S.–China Trade War. China Economic Review, 79, 101033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101033
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Famous Oghenewetha Erekata, Okswuokei Vivian Chekube
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the International Journal of Public Administration and Policy are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share, adapt, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the original creation and license their new creations under the identical terms.
By submitting and publishing with the International Journal of Public Administration and Policy, authors agree to the following terms:
Ownership and Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), ensuring continued free and open access to the research.
Attribution Requirements
When reusing or redistributing the published material, proper attribution must include:
- Citation of the original article.
- Mention of the journal name and publication date.
- A link to the published work and the license details.
ShareAlike Terms
Any derivative works based on the original must be distributed under the same license (CC BY-SA).
Open Access
The International Journal of Public Administration and Policy is dedicated to open access, providing free and unrestricted access to all published articles without subscription fees or other access barriers.
Author Warranties
By submitting the manuscript, authors warrant that:
- The work is original and has not been published elsewhere.
- All co-authors consent to publication.
- The work does not infringe on any copyright, trademark, or proprietary rights.
No Additional Restrictions
Authors and readers are not permitted to impose legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
